Showing posts with label California Proposition 8. Show all posts
Showing posts with label California Proposition 8. Show all posts

Sunday, May 20, 2012

NAACP Board: "We Support Marriage Equality"

Citing the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the NAACP  announced its support for marriage Equality as a civil right in a press release Saturday:
(Miami, Florida) The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People today released a resolution supporting marriage equality. At a meeting of the 103-year old civil rights group’s board of directors, the organization voted to support marriage equality as a continuation of its historic commitment to equal protection under the law.
“The mission of the NAACP has always been to ensure the political, social and economic equality of all people,” said Roslyn M. Brock, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the NAACP. “We have and will oppose efforts to codify discrimination into law.”
“Civil marriage is a civil right and a matter of civil law. The NAACP’s support for marriage equality is deeply rooted in the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and equal protection of all people” said Benjamin Todd Jealous, President and CEO of the NAACP.
The NAACP has addressed civil rights with regard to marriage since Loving v. Virginia declared anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional in 1967. In recent years the NAACP has taken public positions against state and federal efforts to ban the rights and privileges for LGBT citizens, including strong opposition to Proposition 8 in California, the Defense of Marriage Act, and most recently, North Carolina’s Amendment 1, which changed the state constitution’s to prohibit same sex marriage.
Below is the text of the resolution passed by the NAACP board of directors:
The NAACP Constitution affirmatively states our objective to ensure the “political, educational, social and economic equality” of all people. Therefore, the NAACP has opposed and will continue to oppose any national, state, local policy or legislative initiative that seeks to codify discrimination or hatred into the law or to remove the Constitutional rights of LGBT citizens. We support marriage equality consistent with equal protection under the law provided under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.  Further, we strongly affirm the religious freedoms of all people as protected by the First Amendment.
This statement by the oldest and largest civil rights organization in America goes a long way to dispelling the lies put forth by groups like the National Organization for Marriage that strive to drive a wedge between the African American community and the LGBT community.

While surveys have shown that the African American community has been slower to accept LGBT equality than the general population, increases in tolerance continue to be made. The strong leadership shown by the NAACP this week is in accordance with the argument we've been making all along that marriage is a civil right.

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Disgraced Prop 8 Witness Opposes NC Amendment One

David Blankenhorn leaving 9th District Court
in January, 2010 after being ripped a new one. 
This one is just too good to pass up. In an Op Ed piece in this morning's Raleigh News and Observer, David Blankenhorn, founder and president of the Institute for American Values and his wife, Elizabeth Marquardt, a NC native, have once again contradicted themselves on the subject of marriage equality by opposing Amendment One.


Blankenhorn, played with buffoonish perfection by John C. Riley in Dustin Lance Black's stage production "8", was one of only two so-called expert witnesses called by proponents of California's Prop 8 in the court challenge, Perry vs. Schwarzeneggar (now Perry vs. Brown).  The LA Times reported on the trial back in January 2010:
Under cross-examination by David Boies, an attorney for challengers of the ballot measure, Blankenhorn admitted he knew of no study that showed children reared by gay couples fared worse than those raised by heterosexual parents.
Blankenhorn also conceded that same-sex marriage would probably "improve the well-being of gay and lesbian households and their children."
A spokeswoman for proponents of Proposition 8 said she did not know the context in which Blankenhorn made the statement in his book that same-sex marriage would make the United States "more American."
Yes, you read that right. In 2007 Blankenhorn wrote in a book that the U.S. would be "more American on the day we permit same-sex marriage than we were on the day before."


This morning, The Raleigh News and Observer published a piece by Mr. and Mrs. All-Over-The-Map called, "Amendment goes too far", wherein they state their opposition to NC Amendment One. While they still maintain that marriage should be a heteros-only club, the self-contradicting duo writes:
"We believe that marriage is a uniquely important institution that unites mothers and fathers to their children.
But as marriage advocates, we oppose the state marriage amendment now being debated in North Carolina. We hope that when North Carolinians go to the polls on May 8 they will defeat this measure."
So despite being ripped to shreds on the witness stand and having no credible research to back up their claims, Blankenhorn and Marquardt continue to make their discredited arguments, under the guise of fairness. They are against Amendment One because it would ban domestic partnerships, which they see as a more "humane compromise". 

Humane? Really, Dave? What's next, mandatory spay and neuter laws for the gays? 

Thanks for your self-serving support, Dave and Liz, but we can do this without your help. 


Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Will the real Maggie Gallagher please stand up?

The first rule in warfare is "Know your enemy."

Egomaniac, Maggie Gallagher
When it comes to the fight for marriage equality, Maggie Gallagher, founder of the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) is the public face of the anti-gay movement. Tuesday's landmark decision by the 9th Circuit Court overturning California's Proposition 8 as unconstitutional was a major blow to NOM and to the work that Gallagher says she never intended to get involved with in the first place.

In response to the ruling, Gallagher wrote on NOMblog, "Ninth Circuit to 7 Million Voters: You Are Irrational Bigots." A headline like this tells me two things. First that Maggie is paying attention.

Second - and perhaps more importantly - that Gallagher knows how to play the passive/aggressive game that is as old as the Catholic Church. Having been raised by a devoutly Catholic mother, I can tell you that playing the martyr is the last desperate attempt to win a losing battle. When you have nothing left in your arsenal, you nail yourself to the cross and blame the other side. The intent is to win sympathy, but what they usually get is pity and disdain.

To paraphrase Bette Davis, as "Baby Jane" Hudson, "But they are irrational bigots, Maggie! They are irrational bigots!" If they weren't, they wouldn't be so easy to exploit. Conservatives have known this for a very long time. Gallagher may not see herself as a bigot, but she is, if nothing else, a master manipulator and opportunist who believes that as long as she can exploit the bigotry of the masses to get what she wants, the end justifies the means. She has harnessed the homophobia of far right, religious extremists, not because of her faith, but to reshape the world into her own vision of the idealistic life she wanted for herself, but was denied, due, in no small part, to her own bad choices.

Salon.com did an extensive series of in depth interviews with Gallagher and those who know her best that paints a fascinating portrait of a woman who is driven more by her own inner demons than by religious conviction. She tells Salon's Mark Oppenheimer, that her return to the Catholic church after years as an atheist was more of an intellectual choice than a spiritual reawakening:
“I’m a revert,” Gallagher says. “I was raised Catholic. When I was 8, my mother left the church, and she ended up doing a lot of spiritual seeking … I was an atheist from the youngest age. When I was 16, I became a Randian. Becoming a Catholic began as an intellectual thing. In college, I reasoned my way into the pro-life stance. I could not come up with any good reason why the person inside a woman was not a person. Also, I had completely separated sex from procreation, and after I got pregnant, I realized that was a mistake. All the smartest people in the world, draped in all their Ph.D.s, were saying that sex and procreation were separate things, and of course that was just completely not true. The Catholic Church was the only institution that was saying that was not true. On the big issues, I began to realize that on all the issues I thought most deeply about, the church was right.”
The Salon piece depicts a young, naive, somewhat nerdy, college student who was socially awkward and saw herself as a budding, dispassionate intellectual and philosopher. But the young Maggie found out the hard way, as most college kids do, that life is a lot more complicated and more difficult than she'd expected. It's common knowledge that Gallagher got pregnant in college and was a single mother for several years before marrying her current husband. But what is revealed is the indelible impact that pregnancy had on her life and how it shaped her world view and became the motivating force of her life.
As Gallagher tells it, she and the baby’s father were close; they had been together “on the order of one year,” she says, so he might have been expected to stand by her. “My son’s father was my boyfriend at Yale,” is how she describes their relationship. But when she told him she was pregnant, right before spring break in 1982, he vanished on her. “I was in his room and he had to go do something, and I was going to fly out in a couple of hours, had to get to the airport. And the last thing he said to me was, ‘I’ll be back in 30 minutes.’ And then he wasn’t.”
He just left her sitting in his room. And that was the end of them. When summer came, Gallagher moved home to Oregon and took some classes to finish her degree. In the fall, she gave birth to a baby boy, Patrick.
College is not just a time for us to prepare for a career, it's a time when we decide who we will be as a person for the rest of our lives, whether we know it consciously or not. For Maggie Gallagher, college was the time that changed the course of her life, leaving emotional scars that shaped her idealistic world view. Making that distorted world view a reality would become her life's mission.

When Gallagher rails against same-sex marriage, it's not because she hates us, it's because of her colossal ego. She wants the world to be the way she wants it to be, for no other reason than because it's the way she wants it. She believes what she believes and wants the rest of the world to believe it too. This is a characteristic that is shared by many religious leaders (and dictators) and if she must align herself with them to achieve her goals, it's not out of a shared religious conviction, it's because they are useful.

Gallagher reveals that when she started out on her crusade to save traditional marriage, the gays weren't even part of the equation. But for whatever reason, she wasn't making much headway on her career path until the marriage equality victory in Massachusetts. Gallagher smelled blood in the water and went on the attack.

In layman's terms, Maggie Gallagher is an opportunistic control freak with delusions of grandeur. She dismisses any factual evidence that disproves her lies about gays and lesbians and the welfare of the children they may raise because it threatens her sense of self. Gallagher believes that in time, maybe even decades or centuries down the road, she will be proven right, because her fragile, damaged, overblown ego won't allow her to believe anything less.

Read the full Salon interview here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

9th Circuit Rules Prop 8 Unconstitutional

Official "Vote NO on Prop 8" logoImage via WikipediaIn a very narrow ruling that applies only to the case at hand, the 9th Circuit Court ruled this morning that California's Proposition 8 is unconstitutional. The court ruled to uphold Judge Vaughan Walker's decision in part on the basis that Prop 8 removed a right that had previously been granted and violated the US Constitutional right to due process and equal protection.

Further, the court found that the proponents' request to vacate Walker's ruling on the basis that he stood to gain by overturning the anti-gay voter initiative by marrying his partner, was without merit.

The court left the door open to appeal the case, finding that the proponents of Prop 8 had standing in the case, since California governor Jerry brown and his predecessor, Arnold Scharzeneggar chose not to appeal. The question remains as to whether or not the conservative US Supreme Court will choose to hear the case. If not, the ruling will stand as is and only apply to California.

As of right now, it is legal for same-sex couples to marry in California. There has been no word yet about whether the court will issue a stay in the case, but it's safe to say that proponents of Prop 8 will request one.

Enhanced by Zemanta